Well, since you asked "why not": One of the advantages we've found with keeping things on a compatible band is the ad-hoc ability to link dishes to sectors during emergencies, or use dishes and sectors for spectral analysis on the one common band. Another advantage is the uniformity of config / interface / automation by using the same vendor. Don't need to train folks on special procedures or write exceptions into automation. --Bart On 3/29/2018 4:45 PM, Bryan Fields wrote:
On 3/29/18 7:38 PM, Doug Kingston wrote:
For example... Can we reuse a PtoP 5GHz frequency with high isolation (shielding)? Why not use 3.4 GHz UBNT radios? We have a link here in Tampa at 16.2 miles across Tampa Bay running at 130 Mbit/s.
3.37 to 3.5 GHz (the frequency range of the M3 radios) is totally unused for the most part. A complete link is well under $1000 including antennas.