heard 3 independent repeater discussions where folks were thinking and excited they could replace their existing $30 per month internet with $20 per month HamWAN. I don't believe that's a real option due to the Amateur Realm. (The answer is 'Facebook' but that's a different discussion which I hope to start on the 44net sig later this week...)
Did you ask them why they wanted internet at their repeater site? Surely not for YouTube! Maybe they want to link two repeaters together, ideally with low latency. HamWAN can do that, no internet required. It's cheaper and has better control that UHF links.
I'm just curious what they actually want to do.
These were general discussions on repeaters where folks wanted to replace their home Internet access -- out with Comcast and in with HamWAN.... Bill