Resent with my correct eMail address ...

On 2014-04-10 18:56, Dean Gibson wrote:

On 2014-04-10 18:27, Bart Kus wrote:

....

>traceroute 44.24.240.173
traceroute to 44.24.240.173 (44.24.240.173), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
 1  209.59.211.184 (209.59.211.184)  0.172 ms  0.075 ms  0.062 ms
 ...
17  44.24.242.19 (44.24.242.19)  95.778 ms  98.257 ms  95.279 ms
18  44.24.242.10 (44.24.242.10)  142.098 ms  103.353 ms  148.017 ms
19  44.24.240.132 (44.24.240.132)  137.942 ms  112.522 ms  113.787 ms
20  * * *
21  * * *

Nope, that shouldn't be.  The network correctly routed your packets to the right sector @ Paine, and then failed on the very last hop in communicating with your modem?  Depending on where the trace was originating from and the state of your modem's routing table at the time, your modem may have had different ideas about how to reply.  Or, you might have been disconnected at the time?

Where are these following traces from?  The modem?  Was there a specific source IP used?

The trace came from my computer on the Internet at 209.59.217.159, with the exact command you see above.  Are you sure that 44.24.240.132 is the right sector?

  Everything I see comes from 44.24.240.161.  Note (not included above but in my previous message) that I can traceroute to .132 OK, but attempting to go any further back in the inbound traceroute list, seems to repeat a HamWAN IP address and then stop.  The modem was on, I was monitoring it with /interface wireless monitor 0, and the "last-ip" field never changed (as it usually does on an attempted access).

When I post my various messages, none of them are at all urgent, but I like to post "anomalies" if they are of help in administration.  I'm just experimenting.